Student Essay
Quantity or
Quality?
Stem cell research has the potential
to move society one step closer to the mythic well of immortality. Though there is
controversy surrounding the harvesting and destruction of embryos
needed for stem cells, the benefit is the ability for scientists to
regenerate almost any tissue in the body and increase life
expectancy. Unlike
previous scientific advancements, that Francis
Fukuyama, author of Our
Posthuman Future, called straightforward
threats, the threat of stem cell research has not been
determined. In his book,
Fukuyama hypothesizes about the societal implications of further
advancements, which he breaks down into two categories. Category I would be the
stagnation of thinking as age-graded hierarchies continue to dominate
the current social structure. Category
II is the extension of life without the guarantee of quality.
Age-associated illnesses such as Alzheimers and
Parkinsons may be found to be incurable, leading to what
Fukuyama calls the nursing home effect (Fukuyama
69).
Ideally, one would like not merely to live longer but also to have ones different faculties fail as close as possible to when death finally comes, so that one does not have to pass through a period of debility at the end of life.
(Fukuyama 67)
Fukuyamas main argument is the
extension of life without the guarantee.
In the future, biotechnology is likely to offer us
bargains that trade off length of life span for quality of life
(Fukuyama 69).
This nursing home scenario will essentially be the
majority of the latter years spent in a childlike state of dependence
on caretakers. Stem cells can regenerate
any tissue of the body, but this proves to be illusive in terms of
the brain. This inability to cure
brain diseases will create the dependence that Fukuyama considers to
become problematic as birthrates decrease and life expectancy
increases. According to an article in the New York Times,
if a discovery of a cure looms for a disease, it will not be soon. Dr. Elias Zerhouni, director of the National
Institute of Health agrees with this statement saying in a testimony
to a Congressional subcommittee, we are at a very early
stage
and have a great deal of basic research to conduct before
we can unlock the potential of these cells (Zerhouni).
The nursing home effect is
not Fukuyamas only concern.
There are societal concerns as well.
With the prolongation of life, mental and cultural stagnation
may occur because as Fukuyama puts it, generational succession is a
major stimulant of change and progress. If the older generation
refuses to make way for the younger, the paradigm for which the older
generations stands will not change.
Todays society is made up of age-graded
hierarchies such as tenure and review boards. If their thinking
prevails, new ideas may never see the light.
Fukuyama believes this may lead to generational wars and
instability as those witnessed in China during the Cultural
Revolution, in which young, idealistic students attempted to change
the thinking of an ageing power structure that would not budge on
their ideals.
Early on, Fukuyama calls for the power
of the state to regulate biotechnology.
It has to be a global step-up.
A global entity must exist to create and administer
regulations in order to keep things in line.
The United States has passed legislation stating that funding
would be available for the existing 60 stem cell lines.
Other countries are far more lenient.
A consensus must be reached, devoid of the moral implications,
in order for society to benefit as a whole.
In the end, the implications of stem
cell research and biotechnology are far reaching.
We must take time to study and hypothesize about the societal
implications of furthering stem cell research.
Apart from the moral debate about the harvesting of embryonic
stem cells, we must look at the health consequences of prolonging
life as well as the effects on government and culture.
If parallel advancements are not made in regards to
age-related diseases such as Alzheimers or Parkinsons,
but life is still extended, are we making the bargain that Fukuyama
is warning us of: quantity
of life without the guarantee of quality. According to Dr. Zerhouni,
stem cells may someday be used to treat these ailments, but the
research is still in the beginning phase.
If this scenario is true, then Fukuyamas concerns of a
future where generations lives are dependent on the younger
generation may become a reality. With society structured
with age-graded hierarchies, the prolongation of life may stagnate
thinking and ideas, leaving almost no room for change and growth.
Examples of this have been China and North Korea.
Fukuyamas argument is that there are far deeper
implications than we realize. If biotechnology and stem
cell research are to proceed, we must investigate the implications
further and use the resources of governments to help regulate it.
If we do not, we may be setting ourselves up for further
complications and disaster.
Works Cited
Fukuyama, Francis. Our Posthuman Future.
Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
New York. 2002.
Zerhouni, Elias M.D. Statement to Senate
Appropriations Subcommittee on Labor, HHS and Education. National Institutes of Health. 25 September 2002. U.S. Dept. of
Health and Human Services. 5 December 2002. <http://www.nih.gov/about/director/092502sctestimony.htm>.
Topics in
Cellular Aging. American Federation for Aging
Research. 2002. Novartis Foundation for
Gerontology. 5 December 2002. <http://www.healthandage.com/html/min/afar/content/topics5_4.htm>.
| Home | Syllabus | Assignments | Text | Instructor |
last revised: 12-18-02 by Eric Brenner, Skyline College, San Bruno,
CA
These materials are copyrighted but may be used for educational purposes if you inform and credit the author and cite the source as: LSCI 106 Online Research. All commercial rights are reserved. Send comments or suggestions to: Eric Brenner at brenner@smccd.net