LSCI 106: ONLINE RESEARCH 1: INTRODUCTION TO ONLINE RESEARCH
Student Project
Jean J. Powers
RESEARCH QUESTION:
How does the judicial system
determine mental illness from malingering?
The individual, who asserts an
insanity plea as a defense, waives all rights to confidentiality. Nothing is
sacred every scrap of information pertaining to that person their entire life
span is publicly scrutinized. All test results, notes made during the exam,
conversations between the defendant’s family, friends, treating physician, or
associates during the course of the insanity defense evaluation are subject to
review; regardless of whether the forensic psychologist is retained by the
prosecution or defense.
In essence, the job of the forensic
psychologist is to ferret out the clues that ultimately reveal if the defendant
is genuinely insane or malingering, attempting to cop an insanity plea. The
obvious question, was the killer insane at the time of their crime? The astute
defense attorney often times gets away with "designer defenses" to
get their client acquitted. As a result, juries send violent criminals to
mental hospitals and incarcerate the bona fide schizophrenic to prison (Kirwin xi).
GENERAL SEARCH WORKSHEET
|
CONCEPT # |
Search Terms |
|
1 |
mentally ill |
mental illness |
insanity |
. |
. |
|
2 |
justice system |
courts |
Alternative sentence |
laws |
judicial process |
|
3 |
malingering |
manipulation |
psychological eval* |
. |
. |
|
4 |
|
. |
. |
. |
. |
Eisendrath,Stuart
J. “When Munchausen Becomes Malingering: Factitious
Disorders that Penetrate the Legal System” The Bulletin of the
<http://www.psych.org/public_info/insanity.cfm>
Stuart J. Eisendrath
M.D. began his professional training at the Education Medical College of
Wisconsin. Upon completing his postgraduate training from
publications, among many, include “When Munchausen
becomes malingering: factitious disorders that penetrate the legal system.”
This article was published by the
“The Goals of The American
Academy of Psychiatry and the Law promotes scientific and educational
activities in forensic psychiatry by facilitating the exchange of ideas and
practical clinical experience through publications and regularly scheduled
national and regional meetings. A Sponsor of continuing education programs for
both forensic and general psychiatrist and other mental health and legal
professionals and providing information to the public through a speaker's
bureau and published literature” (Eisendrath).
“Psychiatrists are familiar with
factitious disorders, but attorneys and judges usually are not. Cases involving
factitious disorders may enter the civil legal system in a number of ways and
cause incorrect judgments, financial costs, and inappropriate medical care if
these disorders are not identified. Psychiatric consultants may play a key role
in identifying these cases and educating legal personnel about factitious
disorders. This article describes three cases in which persons with factitious
disorders entered the civil litigation system. The role of the psychiatrist in
these cases is discussed. Clues to the identification of factitious disorders
are described. The article also discusses the differentiation of factitious
disorders from malingering and other forms of abnormal illness behavior are
elaborated” (Eisendrath).
Fuller, Torrey
E. Rev. of The Mad, the Bad, and the Innocent,
by Barbara Kirwin.
Gosselin,
<http://web1.infotrac.galegroup.com/itw/infomark/447/880/36701134w1/purl=rc1_ITOF_0_A20098044&dyn=8!ar_fmt?sw_aep=plan_skyline>.
Keiger, Dale “The Dark World of
Park Dietz” Johns
Dale Keiger is senior writer at Johns Hopkins Magazine. A 1976
graduate of the
Dale Keiger provides a vivid perspective in the field of forensic psychiatry, from one of the country's most recognized professional in the field of forensic psychiatry. In his article, Keiger takes you through Dietz's extraordinary life. “As a researcher, consultant, and expert witness, he applies psychiatric knowledge to legal problems and issues of crime and public safety.” Dietz is part medical examiner, part private detective, part scholar of the bizarre”.
Kirwin, Barbara R. The Mad,
the Bad, and the Innocent.
“Kirwin, for her efforts in
shedding insight of the complexities of mental illness, the judicial system and
conflicts therein. Dr. Barbara Kirwin, a
"Kirwin’s text contains a number of potentially misleading statements regarding major topics and the validity and reliability of psychological tests. These statements cry out for elaboration and clarification. Overall her presentation is not dispassionate enough to give the general reader a balanced view of forensic mental-health practice. There’s not enough depth or complexity to reward the reader of with a forensic background. There are insufficient details about methodology or technique to interest the active mental-health practitioner” (Gosselin).
Mansnerus, Laura. "State of Mind" The
New York Times
Mountjoy, John "South Florida Treating Mental
Illness:
Peyrot, Mark "Psychological Testing and
Forensic Decision Making: the properties-in-use of the MMPI. (
| Home
| Syllabus
| Assignments
| Text
| Student
Projects | Instructor
|
last revised:
These materials are copyrighted, but may be used for educational purposes if you inform and credit the author and cite the source as: LSCI 106 Computerized Research. All commercial rights are reserved. Send comments or suggestions to: Eric Brenner at brenner@smccd.net