Skyline Accreditation
 
 < HomePage
 
         
  Accreditation DATA    
           
 
wasc_logo

Skyline Accreditation Steering Committee:
Andreas Wolf 05-06, Jennifer Hughes 06-07, Connie Beringer 07-08, Regina Stanback-Stroud, Lori Adrien, Ray Hernandez, Felix Perez, Donna Elliott, Eric Brenner, Linda Van Sciver, Carla Campillo, Mike Williamson, Cathy Hasson, Nancy Kaplan-Biegel, Anyta Archer, Donna Bestock, luis Padilla 06-07, Taylor Angel 05-06.

Skyline Accreditation Writing Team

SharePoint website click here

Accreditation Self Study Drafts 2.1 and 3.0

 

     
  Accreditation Website Links:
  • Skyline Office of Planning and Research
  • Student Survey Plan
  • Classified, Faculty, and Administration Survey Plans

Accredition Commission for Community and Junior Colleges Publications dated August 2004:

Links to Self Study documents from other Colleges

 

     

Previous Accreditation Resource Links:

2004

 

Resources

 

Archives

 

       
 
This site requires Adobe Acrobat Reader for all Downloads  Get Adobe Reader download FREE
 

Accreditation Self Study Draft 3.0

The Accreditation Self Study process has been underway since Fall 2005 and the College community has been dialoguing, investigating, collaborating, and writing to reflect and document how standards are met set by the Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges (ACCJC) and Western Association of Schools and Colleges (WASC).  The self study has undergone three internal drafts and is the Accreditation Team ready for final feedback.  

Please read through any portions of this draft document and submit feedback through the open forum or directly to your constituency groups no later than Friday, May 4, 2007.     The open forum is to be held on May 2nd from 1:30 - 3:30pm in room 1111.

This feedback will be integrated into the final document.  The final document will be presented to Associated Students, Academic Senate, College Council, Management Team, and the Board of Trustees for approval.  Click here to review the timeline.

Institutional Self-Study Certification Abstracts Organization of the Self-Study
Demographics Skyline Organization Charts District Functional Map
Eligibility Requirements for Accreditation Responses to Recommendations Themes

Standard I

The institution:
Demonstrates strong commitment to a mission that emphasizes achievement of student learning and to communicating the mission internally and externally.

- Uses analyses of quantitative and qualitative data and analysis in an ongoing and systematic cycle of evaluation, integrated planning, implementation, and re-evaluation to verify and improve the effectiveness by which the mission is accomplished.

IA - Institutional Mission
The institution has a statement of mission that defines the institution’s broad educational purposes, its intended student population, and its commitment to achieving student learning.

IB - Institutional Effectiveness
The institution demonstrates a conscious effort to produce and support student learning, measures that learning, assesses how well learning is occurring, and makes changes to improve student learning. The institution also organizes its key processes and allocates its resources to effectively support student learning. The institution demonstrates its effectiveness by providing 1) evidence of the achievement of student learning outcomes and 2) evidence of institution and program performance. The institution uses ongoing and systematic evaluation and planning to refine its key processes and improve student learning.

Standard II

The institution:
Offers high-quality instructional programs, student support services, and library and learning support services that facilitate and demonstrate the achievement of stated student learning outcomes.

- Provides an environment that supports learning, enhances student understanding and appreciation of diversity, and encourages personal and civic responsibility as well as intellectual, aesthetic, and personal development for all of its students.

IIA - Student Learning Programs
The institution offers high-quality instructional programs in recognized and emerging fields of study that culminate in identified student outcomes leading to degrees, certificates, employment, or transfer to other higher education institutions or programs consistent with its mission. Instructional programs are systematically assessed in order to assure currency, improve teaching and learning strategies, and achieve stated student learning outcomes. The provisions of this standard are broadly applicable to all instructional activities offered in the name of the institution.

IIB - Student Support Services
The institution recruits and admits diverse students who are able to benefit from its programs, consistent with its mission. Student support services address the identified needs of students and enhance a supportive learning environment. The entire student pathway through the institutional experience is characterized by a concern for student access, progress, learning, and success. The institution systematically assesses student support services using student learning outcomes, faculty and staff input, and other appropriate measures in order to improve the effectiveness of these services.

IIC - Library & Learning Support
Library and other learning support services for students are sufficient to support the institution’s instructional programs and intellectual, aesthetic, and cultural activities in whatever format and wherever they are offered. Such services include library services and collections, tutoring, learning centers, computer laboratories, and learning technology development and training. The institution provides access and training to students so that library and other learning support services may be used effectively and efficiently. The institution systematically assesses these services using student learning outcomes, faculty input, and other appropriate measures in order to improve the effectiveness of the services.

Standard III

The institution effectively uses its human, physical, technology, and financial resources to achieve its broad educational purposes, including stated student learning outcomes, and to improve institutional effectiveness.

IIIA - Human Resources
The institution employs qualified personnel to support student learning programs and services wherever offered and by whatever means delivered, and to improve institutional effectiveness. Personnel are treated equitably, are evaluated regularly and systematically, and are provided opportunities for professional development. Consistent with its mission, the institution demonstrates its commitment to the significant educational role played by persons of diverse backgrounds by making positive efforts to encourage such diversity. Human resource planning is integrated with institutional planning.

IIIB - Physical Resources
Physical resources, which include facilities, equipment, land, and other assets, support student learning programs and services and improve institutional effectiveness. Physical resource planning is integrated with institutional planning.

IIIC - Technology Resources
Technology resources are used to support student learning programs and services and to improve institutional effectiveness. Technology planning is integrated with institutional planning.

IIID - Financial Resources
Financial resources are sufficient to support student learning programs and services and to improve institutional effectiveness. The distribution of resources supports the development, maintenance, and enhancement of programs and services. The institution plans and manages its financial affairs with integrity and in a manner that ensures financial stability. The level of financial resources provides a reasonable expectation of both short-term and long-term financial solvency. Financial resources planning is integrated with institutional planning.

Standard IV

The institution recognizes and utilizes the contributions of leadership throughout the organization for continuous improvement of the institution.

Governance roles are designed to facilitate decisions that support student learning programs and services and improve institutional effectiveness, while acknowledging the designated responsibilities of the governing board and the chief administrator.

IVA - Institutional Leadership
The institution recognizes that ethical and effective leadership throughout the organization enables the institution to identify institutional values, set and achieve goals, learn, and improve.

IVB - Institutional Governance
In addition to the leadership of individuals and constituencies, institutions recognize the designated responsibilities of the governing board for setting policies and of the chief administrator for the effective operation of the institution. Multi-college districts/systems clearly define the organizational roles of the district/system and the colleges.

 


Accreditation Self Study Draft 2.1

 

The Accreditation Self Study process has been underway since Fall 2005 and the College community has been dialoguing, investigating, collaborating, and writing to reflect and document how standards are met set by the Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges (ACCJC) and Western Association of Schools and Colleges (WASC).  The self study has undergone two internal drafts and is now ready for public view and critique.  

 

The Accreditation Team is ready for your input.  Please read through any portions of this draft document and submit feedback no later than Monday, March 19, 2007. 
 

Perform the following steps to submit feedback:

  1. Click on any of the following links to access a component of the self study draft.  A .pdf document will open in a new window.

  2. On each page of the document you will see a "submit comments" button.  Click on it.

  3. Your email client will open with a reply email address and subject header already identified.  When giving feedback please do the following:

  • Identify the "line number(s)" listed to the left of the text.

  • Provide your comments being as specific as possible providing constructive feedback. 

    • Comments about whether or not the question is completely answered, whether all the information included is relevant to the particular question and about the accuracy of the information are particularly needed.  If you have a factual correction to suggest, citing evidence would be particularly helpful.  

    • Concerns about style, format and mechanics of writing will be taken care of by the editor and need not be commented on.

  • Submit the email by pressing "send".  You must be connected to the internet for the email to be sent.

This feedback will be channeled back to the writing teams for incorporation into the final draft slated for April.  Shortly thereafter a College wide forum will be arranged to allow for one final opportunity to engage in the process at which time the document will be finalized for print and submitted to constituency groups and the District Board for final approval.  Click here to review the timeline.

 

Institutional Self-Study Certification Abstracts Organization of the Self-Study
Demographics Skyline Organization Charts District Functional Map
Eligibility Requirements for Accreditation Responses to Recommendations Themes

 

Standard I

The institution:

- Demonstrates strong commitment to a mission that emphasizes achievement of student learning and to communicating the mission internally and externally.

- Uses analyses of quantitative and qualitative data and analysis in an ongoing and systematic cycle of evaluation, integrated planning, implementation, and re-evaluation to verify and improve the effectiveness by which the mission is accomplished.

 

IA - Institutional Mission

The institution has a statement of mission that defines the institution’s broad educational purposes, its intended student population, and its commitment to achieving student learning.

 

IB - Institutional Effectiveness
The institution demonstrates a conscious effort to produce and support student learning, measures that learning, assesses how well learning is occurring, and makes changes to improve student learning. The institution also organizes its key processes and allocates its resources to effectively support student learning. The institution demonstrates its effectiveness by providing 1) evidence of the achievement of student learning outcomes and 2) evidence of institution and program performance. The institution uses ongoing and systematic evaluation and planning to refine its key processes and improve student learning.

 

Standard II 

The institution:

- Offers high-quality instructional programs, student support services, and library and learning support services that facilitate and demonstrate the achievement of stated student learning outcomes.

- Provides an environment that supports learning, enhances student understanding and appreciation of diversity, and encourages personal and civic responsibility as well as intellectual, aesthetic, and personal development for all of its students.

 

IIA - Student Learning Programs

The institution offers high-quality instructional programs in recognized and emerging fields of study that culminate in identified student outcomes leading to degrees, certificates, employment, or transfer to other higher education institutions or programs consistent with its mission. Instructional programs are systematically assessed in order to assure currency, improve teaching and learning strategies, and achieve stated student learning outcomes. The provisions of this standard are broadly applicable to all instructional activities offered in the name of the institution.

 

IIB - Student Support Services

The institution recruits and admits diverse students who are able to benefit from its programs, consistent with its mission. Student support services address the identified needs of students and enhance a supportive learning environment. The entire student pathway through the institutional experience is characterized by a concern for student access, progress, learning, and success. The institution systematically assesses student support services using student learning outcomes, faculty and staff input, and other appropriate measures in order to improve the effectiveness of these services.

 

IIC - Library & Learning Support

Library and other learning support services for students are sufficient to support the institution’s instructional programs and intellectual, aesthetic, and cultural activities in whatever format and wherever they are offered. Such services include library services and collections, tutoring, learning centers, computer laboratories, and learning technology development and training. The institution provides access and training to students so that library and other learning support services may be used effectively and efficiently. The institution systematically assesses these services using student learning outcomes, faculty input, and other appropriate measures in order to improve the effectiveness of the services.

 

Standard III

The institution effectively uses its human, physical, technology, and financial resources to achieve its broad educational purposes, including stated student learning outcomes, and to improve institutional effectiveness.

 

IIIA - Human Resources

The institution employs qualified personnel to support student learning programs and services wherever offered and by whatever means delivered, and to improve institutional effectiveness. Personnel are treated equitably, are evaluated regularly and systematically, and are provided opportunities for professional development. Consistent with its mission, the institution demonstrates its commitment to the significant educational role played by persons of diverse backgrounds by making positive efforts to encourage such diversity. Human resource planning is integrated with institutional planning.

 

IIIB - Physical Resources

Physical resources, which include facilities, equipment, land, and other assets, support student learning programs and services and improve institutional effectiveness. Physical resource planning is integrated with institutional planning.

 

IIIC - Technology Resources

Technology resources are used to support student learning programs and services and to improve institutional effectiveness. Technology planning is integrated with institutional planning.

 

IIID - Financial Resources

Financial resources are sufficient to support student learning programs and services and to improve institutional effectiveness. The distribution of resources supports the development, maintenance, and enhancement of programs and services. The institution plans and manages its financial affairs with integrity and in a manner that ensures financial stability. The level of financial resources provides a reasonable expectation of both short-term and long-term financial solvency. Financial resources planning is integrated with institutional plann

Standard IV

The institution recognizes and utilizes the contributions of leadership throughout the organization for continuous improvement of the institution.

Governance roles are designed to facilitate decisions that support student learning programs and services and improve institutional effectiveness, while acknowledging the designated responsibilities of the governing board and the chief administrator.
 

IVA - Institutional Leadership

The institution recognizes that ethical and effective leadership throughout the organization enables the institution to identify institutional values, set and achieve goals, learn, and improve.

 

IVB - Institutional Governance

In addition to the leadership of individuals and constituencies, institutions recognize the designated responsibilities of the governing board for setting policies and of the chief administrator for the effective operation of the institution. Multi-college districts/systems clearly define the organizational roles of the district/system and the colleges.